<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>&#34;Maximum Results Copywriting&#34;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/copywriting/why-do-big-financial-institutions-have-such-dumb-advertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maximumresultscopywriting.com</link>
	<description>More Clients...More Sales...More Cash In Your Pocket!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:58:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Why Do Big Financial Institutions Have Such Dumb Advertising?</title>
		<link>http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/copywriting/why-do-big-financial-institutions-have-such-dumb-advertising</link>
		<comments>http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/copywriting/why-do-big-financial-institutions-have-such-dumb-advertising#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copywriting for financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copywriting on financial institutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tips, insights and comment on direct response marketing and copywriting<br /><br />In the City today I couldn&#8217;t help notice a new advertising campaign from BT Financial Group, one of the big local funds managers. It&#8217;s promoting their superannuation (retirement savings) products and the part that I saw was the outdoor display ads. There&#8217;s a whole series of these advertisements and they all have a question theme [...]<br /><br />"More Clients...More Sales...More Cash In Your Pocket!'<br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>In the City today I couldn&#8217;t help notice a new advertising campaign from BT Financial Group, one of the big local funds managers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s promoting their superannuation (retirement savings) products and the part that I saw was the outdoor display ads.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a whole series of these advertisements and they all have a question theme along the lines of&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Do we really care more about organising our music than our super?&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Every year the average Australian spends 40 days watching TV.  Why don&#8217;t we spend more time on our super?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>&#8230;and so on.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s wrong with this?  Two things&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-103"></span>1) The questions are likely to produce a &#8220;Huh?&#8221; or &#8220;Who cares?&#8221; kind of response; and</p>
<p>2) They come across as &#8220;nagging&#8221;.  Look, this is one of those topics that most people know they should spend more time on, but it&#8217;s like better diet and exercise.  They never seem to get around to it and they don&#8217;t like being reminded of their failings.</p>
<p>Look, simply by the blanket coverage, this might make an impact and people who see the ads will have the idea that &#8220;They should do something about super&#8221; planted in their minds.  But they are not likely to take immediate action and most likely never will (even if they do, BT may well not be the beneficiary).</p>
<p>This is the classic kind of &#8220;brand awareness&#8221; ad that is basically a huge waste of money.  A shame because some of the supporting material for the campaign is quite good (I went and checked out the website as part of my research for this post).</p>
<p>So what would be a better copywriting approach?  Tricky, because as I said superannuation isn&#8217;t &#8220;top of mind&#8221; for most people. So finding Robert Collier&#8217;s &#8220;existing conversation&#8221; presents challenges.  However, making a direct appeal to the pocketbook is likely to be more effective (combined with a direct Call To Action, of course).</p>
<p>For example, &#8220;Discover how you can add $100,000 or more to your super account without making any additional contributions&#8221;.  Disclaimer here, in that I appreciate there are constraints on claims in advertising regulated financial products.  However, one way to increase the value of a superannuation account is to cut the fees that are paid.  And there are ways that a funds manager can help people do that.</p>
<p>While on the topic of dumb copywriting and advertising from big financial institutions, I came across this recently from French bank BNP Paribas&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Embrace The Future With BNP Paribas.  The bank for a changing world.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Yuk!  What is is with these guys?  I guess firstly, they have money to spend and are susceptible to flattery from smooth talking advertising agencies.  So bankers are absolute suckers for &#8220;image advertising&#8221;.</p>
<p>Secondly, despite the fact that banks make a lot of money, they don&#8217;t actually know much about marketing. Strange, but true, and to justify that outrageous statement I would need another quite lengthy post that I don&#8217;t intend to write just now.  Suffice to say that I worked in banking for over 20 years so I have some knowledge on the topic.</p>
<p>Of course, even that tagline from BNP Paribas isn&#8217;t quite as laughable as the campaign from my one time employer Societe Generale&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Red, Black And Rising!&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The red and black refer to the bank&#8217;s corporate colours and the rising was supposed to refer to the bank&#8217;s increasing success and prominence (until they famously lost about US$4 billion at the beginning of 2008 as the result of a &#8220;rogue trader&#8221;).  But what on earth is this supposed to mean to a potential client?  Why would anyone want to do business with the bank because of this ad?</p>
<p>Absolutely the worst kind of &#8220;bragging&#8221; ad.  Amazingly, the campaign ran for several years.  Just as well they couldn&#8217;t measure the results and that at the time business was good (as it was for all banks, by the way).</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-103"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/copywriting/why-do-big-financial-institutions-have-such-dumb-advertising/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

