<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>&#34;Maximum Results Copywriting&#34;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/copywriting/someone-didnt-get-the-reason-why-copywriting-memo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maximumresultscopywriting.com</link>
	<description>More Clients...More Sales...More Cash In Your Pocket!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:58:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Someone Didn&#8217;t Get The &#8220;Reason Why Copywriting&#8221; Memo</title>
		<link>http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/copywriting/someone-didnt-get-the-reason-why-copywriting-memo</link>
		<comments>http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/copywriting/someone-didnt-get-the-reason-why-copywriting-memo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertise tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason why copywriting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tips, insights and comment on direct response marketing and copywriting<br /><br />Here&#8217;s a couple more current ads from Australian financial institutions that provide illustrations of bad and not-so-bad copywriting. Let me say, I don&#8217;t pick on financial institutions out of spite or some sort of grudge. It&#8217;s just that they seem to be so prominent and, often, so poor. As I&#8217;ve observed previously, they seem to [...]<br /><br />"More Clients...More Sales...More Cash In Your Pocket!'<br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>Here&#8217;s a couple more current ads from Australian financial institutions that provide illustrations of bad and not-so-bad copywriting.</p>
<p>Let me say, I don&#8217;t pick on financial institutions out of spite or some sort of grudge.  It&#8217;s just that they seem to be so prominent and, often, so poor.  As I&#8217;ve observed previously, they seem to have money to burn.</p>
<p>The first example is from an outdoor display ad from National Australia Bank.  It&#8217;s pitching at the business banking market, where there seems to be a battle for market share going on.</p>
<p><span id="more-109"></span>The headline is &#8220;Changing Times&#8221; and the copy goes&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;We currently lend $90 billion to Australian businesses.</em></p>
<p><em>Need a reason to change your bank?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Unbelievable, huh?  At least they remembered to have a call to action at the bottom of the ad with contact details (although I doubt if they&#8217;ll get many calls).</p>
<p>What are these people thinking? The answer that most business owners are likely to give is&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Yes I do need a very good reason to change!  I hate all banks but why the hell would I want to do business with you expletives?!*?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>National Australia Bank are one of these big organisations that seem to have an enormously inflated sense of their own importance.  It&#8217;s as if they can&#8217;t imagine why people wouldn&#8217;t be falling over themselves to do business with them simply because of who they are.</p>
<p>As an aside, the ad is in the name of &#8220;NAB Business Banking&#8221;.  Interesting, as a couple of years ago they had a big campaign to rebrand themselves as the &#8220;National&#8221;.  Guess that campaign didn&#8217;t work out so well.</p>
<p>In contrast, here&#8217;s a better ad from a smaller bank, BankWest&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Home Loan Lender Of The Year 2008.</em></p>
<p><em>Come in, we&#8217;re happy to show you why.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>OK, there&#8217;s a bit of &#8220;chest beating&#8221; here but there&#8217;s an implied benefit for the customer.  It would be better if there was a solid benefit presented up front of course.  The implied benefit, social proof and curiosity may not be enough to overcome scepticism and get someone in the door. But this has a good chance of working.</p>
<p>Finally, some shocking news on the local business scene.  Starbucks Australia announced today that they will be closing 61 of their current 84 stores. Aaargh!  I hope my local outlet survives but I fear the worst.  Given the cutbacks by the parent company in North America this move isn&#8217;t all that surprising.</p>
<p>It also has a broader marketing message (linked to the &#8220;social mood&#8221; issue I mentioned yesterday) and I&#8217;ll have more to say about that tomorrow (hopefully after I&#8217;ve fortified myself with my customary Venti Flat White!).</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-109"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maximumresultscopywriting.com/copywriting/someone-didnt-get-the-reason-why-copywriting-memo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

